Quantcast
Channel: PTC Community : Unanswered Discussions - Creo
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8685

Family Table and Parameter Column

$
0
0

This question is to confirm something with regard to Connection Parameters used in Family Tables.

 

When you you use mechanism connections, in my case the General Constraint set, I found an odd behavior.

I have a part in an assembly with X-Y translations limits.  I also enabled the zero position.

 

In Family Tables, you can access connection parameters and I set TRANSLATIONn_ZERO_POSITION in the table for X and Y.

 

What is weird, and what I want to confirm, why is the value set in the Family Table additive rather than value used in the position?

 

Here is a better explanation: I have a range from -5 to .5 assigned to my X position.  My zero position is .5.  But when I assign -.5 in the table, it becomes additive and offsets the mating planes in the instance.  In fact, the only way to make this work correctly is to use 0 and 1 for the range I have specified.

 

Is this normal or have others found issues with this?

 

Here the 1st image is the generic:  Notice how the ,measurement comes from the center of the lower hole.  The regen value is .5

 

zero_generic.PNG

 

...Now the instance with the value set at 0.5

 

zero_instance.PNG

...notice how the start of the offset moved 1" and then the -.5 from the family table is applied.

 

Is this expected behavior or a bug?

 

Creo 2.0 M040

I was hoping to test this on M070 but it is late in releasing.

 

I have attached the file for testing.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8685

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>