I'm looking for the Creo equivalent of a grinder.
I have a model I need to modify to match scan data. I need to remove the extra material in the corners of this model but not affect the nearby threads:
I've tried the warp feature but didn't have fine enough control. I don't own a license or Freestyle or Style. Would one of these products lay a tight mesh over the entire model and then allow me to pull on any of the nodes in any direction? Is there a better way?
Thanks.
I want to know that is there any command to move part to assembly origin.
As an example,
As you see in attach photo,
part origin and assembly origin is different.
I want to move part origin to assembly origin.
I am student in IUPUI. I want to download creo 2.0 and i don't know how to do that. I need help urgent.
Thank you,
Varun Naidu
My organization performs modifications to vehicles, and I would like to know how to better structure our assemblies to decrease load times and increase computer performance. At the moment we have a very bottom up approach to assemblies, where the parts are modeled, then placed in assemblies, which are then placed in installation models. These installation models typically contain a model of local vehicle structure which we will be using to attach our parts and assemblies. Finally all installation models are rolled up into a general arrangement model, which contains a full layout of the vehicle. This approach has worked out well enough for us in the past on smaller projects with only a few installations. However, this approach is not ideal on large projects with many (15+) installations, containing thousands of parts (hardware, designed parts, and reference structure), especially when multiple installations reference the same structure (this means the same structure would appear multiple times in the general arrangement assembly).
What I would like to know is if its possible to take a top down approach; where, the complete vehicle structure is found in the highest level (general arrangement) assembly, and each installation (next lower level assembly) can reference its necessary structure? I know skeleton models can work in a similar manner to what I have described above; however, I do not know if its possible for this reference structure to appear in the installation level drawings. Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
I want to thank everyone that helped me enable the Feature Recognition Tool. Now it's time to put that tool to good use.
I get (have) to work with Solidworks on a daily basis. When I import any part or assembly from an outside source it uses a feature recognition tool that I think is pretty awesome. In comparison I look at what I have available from Creo Parametric 2, and wonder how I am going to get what I am looking for.
With the Solidworks FRT I have the option of the system recognize the incoming part as a sheet metal part. Is there anything from Creo Parametric 2 that allows me to do that? Also I noticed that Creo doesn't automatically recognize features. Is there any way to get Creo Parametric 2 to automatically recognize features?
I want to register a new file type & description fo my application.
I have initialized IpfcFileOpenRegisterOptions using New CCpfcFileOpenRegisterOptions
but No ccpfc Listener option availabe to initialize IpfcFileOpenRegisterListener.
When I create a pdf file of my drawing, a component disappears from one of the section views, and the bottom half of the component disappears from the other section view. It sometimes shows that way in the Proe Wildfire 5 .drw file, but then it returns to normal when I update the display. I am attaching a couple of screen shots of the pdf. You can see the dimension line goes down to where the component should be showing.
can set model view name to drawing view with ProDrawingViewOrientationFromNameSet but there is not Get API for same.
Is there workaround to get it ?
Following code sets model view name
//Get current drawing
ProDrawing model;
result = ProMdlCurrentGet((ProMdl*)&model);
if(result != PRO_TK_NO_ERROR)
{
ProEngineerEnd();
return false;
}
ProMdlName name;
result = ProMdlNameGet(model, name);
ProMdldata data;
result = ProMdlDataGet(model, &data);
ProView view;
result = ProDrawingViewInit(model, 1, &view);
ProName name1;
result=ProDrawingViewNameGet(model, view, name1);
ProMatrix metrix;
result = ProDrawingViewTransformGet(model, view, PRO_B_TRUE, metrix);
if(result==PRO_TK_NO_ERROR)
{
result = ProDrawingViewOrientationFromNameSet(model, view, L"ABC", L"Isometric", 0.0, 0.0);
}
result = ProDrawingViewRegenerate(model, view);
ProDrawingCurrentSheetSet(model, 1);
int iWin;
ProWindowCurrentGet(&iWin);
ProDrawingtreeRefresh(model,iWin);
//Window Refit
ProWindowRefit(iWin);
But how to get Model View name
how to add the folder "D:\Program Files\PTC\Creo 3.0\Common Files\protoolkit\" to Exception Site List in Java Control Panel?
java 1.8.x
windows 7 x64
internet explorer 11
on the Java web site, there are only exsamples for HTTP and HTTPS,
there is NOT any exsample for FILE protocol.
file:///D:\Program Files\PTC\Creo 3.0\Common Files\protoolkit\
file:///D:/Program Files/PTC/Creo 3.0/Common Files/protoolkit/
neither works
as a result , when i open the ProToolKit API , there comes the java security warning message.
Hello,
I am attempting to create a linkage system in Creo. I can parameterize everything so that the linkage system can move and change position, but I am not sure how to track these positions.
Ideally, I would add a few points in, then record their positions for various movement sweeps. I could then export the data to excel and plot the path they took.
I could feasibly do this manually, but I know SolidWorks has an add-in for this and I'm sure there must be some PTC equivalent.
Thanks for any input,
Matt
Please share your experience of New version of PTC Creo 4.0 with features and models. And also tell more about ur produce and which version u will recommend to people.
Hallo Creo Simulate community
I am working on a frame construction and would like to do some mechanical simulations with this frame. The simple construction is a 3D Frame with cable elements (can only carry tension).
Can anybody help me? How one has to define a "tension only beam" in Creo Simulate?
Thank you for your support
Otto
Hello Community,
I'm having the problem with BOM Tables. How can I sort BOM table in the assembly drawing Based on the Name or the Quantity of the component or the type of Materials?
-
Sundar Dannana
It is possible to keep texture and image imported in part surface then when exporting to pvz,u3dpdf and navieswork.
Please advice me.
How to write file path in drawing@SB
Hello, I would like to kwow how can i modify the CONFIG.PRO ----> to put dimension with text "parallel to and above leader" ??
Thank you.
Fabrice...
Here is my scenario
What am I doing wrong?
Additionally, in CATIA V5 there is a solid called PartBody. This PartBody contains the CATIA V5 solid that I want to import into CREO 3.0. This PartBody in CATIA can contain a solid that is separated and not continuous. Think of a solid seat track that has a part of it removed. See attached picture.
This part is a component of a CATIA V5 Assembly.
when I import the CATIA V5 Assembly, which contains the part above, CREO 3.0 turns this CATIA V5 part into a CREO 3.0 Assembly with each of the sections of the original CATIA V5 part as a separate part in CREO. And the CSYS also show. See picture below:
Any suggestions?
Creo 2, M230
Our part & assy templates include some default relations for setting mass properties parameters but also for setting the value of the "Part_no" parameter based on the file name. If I save a part as a mirror, I don't see any way to force Creo to create the mirror based on my template, therefore those relations get lost. The parameters do come along, but they retain the values from the parent. That means that two files have the same value for the P/N, even though their file names are different.
Is there a way to force Creo to include relations from my template part when creating a mirrored part?
Hi all,
I have made a centrifugal pump in, CREO 2.0.using an in volute curve as a trajectory for the swept blends containing different sketches as profile for swept blend feature. Now I want to show these section profiles in drawing by sectioning them at the profile planes. But the problem is those section sketches are internal (i-e they are within the swept blend feature) which means they have no plane predefined for them as these sketches are normal to the trajectory. So do I have to define DTM planes parallel to the section profiles to use them as section view to show in drawings or is there any other way to section at those profiles without defining additional planes? (i am avoiding defining additional DTM planes as these will crowd my model tree and they will be there only for section view, and no other purpose)
Thanks
Hi,
I am using PTC Windchil and after selecting the model i wish to view and manipulate from Windchil, CreoView just opens as a black screen. It was working fine on the friday and yesterday the problem appeared.HELP!!. Thanks in advance.
