Helllo,
I have following problem.
Using Creo web browser with SharePoint 2010 and IE11 still getting me this error:
error occurred in the script on this page
line: 1
sign: 60890
error: Object doesn't support property or method 'addEventListener'
Would you like to run scripts on this site in future?
Does anyone have any idea on how to solve this? Mozilla is no way for us. In IE11 itself page loads normaly.
Ive created a pattern of which the number of members are driven by a parameter, this number of members is variable.
All members should be merged in order to create a solid from the pattern.
How can I automatically merge all members in the pattern independent of the number of quilts?
Hey guys,
I am wondering if there is a solution for what I want to accomplish....
I have a interchange assembly with some parts that are similar, but within my family table on the upper assembly is there a way I could basically say, hey I want this part in my interchange assembly.
I realize that I can do a replace within my upper assembly and choose a different part.... BUT can I do that same option within a family table on the upper assembly, so that when I open a instance it shows various different configurations of my interchange assembies.
I know that within the upper assembly if I want to replace a componant with a different instance I can do that but could i do the same thing with interchange possibly thru a user defined feature? or relation?
I have a 30 day trial and I am trying to send an assembly that I made to someone who has the full version of Creo. I zipped a fodler with all the parts and the assembly but when he tried to open it he couldn't because apparently these two versions of Creo are not compatible. Is there any way that I can still send him the assembly? Thanks!
Greetings all.
We are upgrading to Windchill 10.2 and Creo 2.0 from Windchill 9.1 and Pro/Elements 5.0 We are wanting to use the "Mark up" funciton in Creo View to both mark up our drawings in the review process and to retain the information for later review of the design process.
I am looking for best practices, and how to understand the way that Creo View works.
How are annotations preserved when the revision changes?
Will the annotation stay with the revision it was added to, or will it transmit to the next revision?
Also, will they stay permanently or are they deleted when a Creo drawing or model is released?
Thanks in advance, James
Working with SW, it brings in bend radius by default. Is there a way to set this up in Creo Parametric 2.0?
When creating a drawing in Creo Parametric, Is there a way to display cosmetic features in a detailed view independent of the view's parent?
What I'd like to do is have a detailed view at an increased view-scale with a cosmetic drawing in it that is not shown in the detailed view's parent view. Is this possible?
| Sl.no | Problem | issue facing |
| 1 | Running of wire in both side without tangency net work | Making tangency network for the wire running in both side has the below disadvantage |
| 1. Flatten of harness become difficult | ||
| 2. Wire length short due to tangency net work. | ||
| 3.wire branch out dimension showing issue . | ||
| 4.For actual Manufacturing of harness length will become short. | ||
| 2 | converting to iges/Step | Unable to convert to iges/step. |
| 1.Pro-e getting crashed | ||
| 2.Some of the harness after converting only connector visible. No harness. | ||
| 3 | Branching | Branching with intermediate gape. |
| 1.Wire getting not routed. | ||
| 2.Wire getting failed after regenerating. | ||
| 3.Unable to make bundle. | ||
| 4.Unable to make harness as per the physical harness branching. | ||
| 4 | wire failure | Wire getting failed |
| 1. out of many wire routed one wires fails saying no net work. Start and end point same for all wires. | ||
| 2. Wire routing does not go up to end point . Stops in between in a spice or break out | ||
| 3. While auto routing - after few wire route when we try to route the other wire the existing routed wire fails | ||
| 4.After routing the wires and when we try to bundle wires fails. | ||
| 5.Routing of 300 plus wire in single short in auto routing become difficult .wires getting failed. | ||
| 5 | Splice | splice adding in between the intermediate gape |
| 1.Splice should be a part of single wire.In pro-e we add the splice in net work which make other wires also to pass through the splice which cause wire failer due to bend bend radius | ||
| 2. We are giving 50mm clearance between the two splice. When we add many splice in a net work wires getting failed. | ||
| 6 | Modification | Small modification |
| 1.small modification (adding wires,relocating the connector position)call for change in flatten and drawing which take long time . | ||
| This time is not excepted. | ||
| 7 | Regeneration | 1.Auto regeneration is not happening we need to regenatre manual after wire routing very time |
| 2. Due to this regenration issue wire are not visible after routing. | ||
| 3. wire failure and bundle failure comes. | ||
| 8 | Auto routing | Designation of component |
| 1.If the model name and part name is same auto designation take place but in harness we use reference number for each component . We are using some component in more than three place . At present we are making manual.How to designated all parts with auto designated. | ||
| 9 | Flatten | flatten of harness |
| Our harness has more than 300 wires. For flatten of harness we use manual flatten method. It taken lot of time for flatten of all wires. Auto pan in pro-e is not helping us to resolve this issue. | ||
| 10 | Drawing | Tables for each connector |
| 1.Placing table for each connector is becoming one of time consuming process in pro-e. After placing the individual table we need to releate to model with table for wires to update for each connector table. |
Will be Creo 3 multithreading?
Regards
I want to know if it is possible to have a different background when working with a model and when working in a drawing.
Because the current background colour I have is the same for in a model view and in a drawing view. But I can't find a good colour to use for both options.
So is it possible to achieve this and how can you do this.
Hi All,
I am stuck with this very simple part unbending, and not able to unbend the last bend.
Can anybody help!
Thanks,
Shashank
I am trying to gather some best practices documents to distribute in my company. The main reason for this is that we have many designers who are, quite frankly, terrible at using Pro/E. This is primarily due to a company culture where the older designers who are bad at using Pro/E teach new designers how to be bad at using Pro/E. This cycle continues over an over until you have terrible models/drawings with problems such as:
1. Sketches with no strong dimension or constraints. One wrong move and you blow up the whole sketch.
2. Plates with holes that are created using a revolve rather than the hole tool or an extruded cut.
3. Sheet metal parts that are modeled as a solid, shelled, and roundeded (never converted to an actual sheet metal part).
4. Layers that are an absolute disaster. In many cases designers will hide features/datums instead of putting them on the proper layer and hiding the layer.
5. No concept of simplified reps. They try to do pretty much everything in the Master Rep and can't understand why it takes half an hour to load a model.
6. Hydraulic hoses and tubes that are created without Pro/Piping which means that useful information can not be extracted from the models.
I have been asked to help remedy this by providing tutorials showing what is accepted as the best practice for several of these issues. The problem is that I have very limited time to work on this so I would like to gather as many as I can from internet sources. If anyone can provide links to best practices documents or send them to me directly, I would be very grateful.
Is anyone doing anything advanced to help compute toolpaths faster? I have a hot job and naturally its one of the most complex parts I've done. I am doing a Local Milling routine referencing a previous sequence and it takes a long time to generate the toolpath. (Over an hour) Theres no easy way to break it up into smaller segments either. Although I may have to try. Is anyone doing distributed computing or something that i may not know about? Its also annoying that I have 1 CPU maxed out and 7 others just hanging out doing nothing. (I know CREO does not multi thread yet but its frustrating).
I am running CREO 2 and my workstation is:
Windows 7 64-bit
Intel Core i7 CPU @ 3.80GHz
32 GB DDR3 Ram
Nvidia Quadro 5000
Topic: Custom color scheme and displaying custom colors on the onscreen color palette.
I would like to add our office color (layer names) to the Graphics and or in the Appearance Gallery.
I'd like to add the company colors (layers) to an existing ptc folder or be able to create a Users color / layer folder, and be
able to access and use them from Creo 2.0 on screen menus when I'm working. I'm sure or least hope there is a way
to to this but I haven't found it. I've been using PTC Pro E 5.o and know Creo 2.0 for about 2 years. I'm a little
frustrated at how un user friendly the softwar is. I've use AutoCad for 22 years and some Revit Structural and Solid works
and they are all more user friendly. I would appreaciate any direction in finding a solution. And I agree with other PTC users
out there, Give us a hard copy reference book, detailed, so we can research, book mark and find answers more easily.
Hello,
When I want to insert Notes with multi lines and I press enter key, the notes box closes. How can I enter multiply lines?
Thanks!
I have been trying for nearly a day to wrap my head around the myriad configuration options that I need to set in order to get the results I want. I won't mention the config.pro options and the .dtl options I have set alreadybecause that will just confuse the heck out of everyone. I'd like to start with a blank slate.
Here's what I want:
Secondarily:
This should not be too difficult, but wading through all the command prompt options and (PTC's attempts at explaining them) available in config.pro and my .dtl file, not to mention the View>Display Settings>Model Display>"Dimension Tolerances" check box, which to make no difference to anything...
I am working in Creo/Elements.... 5.0.
I am wondering if there is a way to control a dimension such that the area of the sketch will be a given value. What I am trying to do is control one sketch based on a height diemsion and the area of a different sketch. I have one sketch that I modify. Then a second sketch that has locked dimensions besides height is meant to be 2 times the area and I currently just modify height until I get it to be what I want it to be. I am trying to automate that process,
Thanks,
Brad
Hi everyone,
I am new to Creo shematics and I have troubles making a simple splice on a wire. I precisely followed the indications in the doc page "To Insert a Splice" with no success; the cursor does not become "T shaped" as it is supposed.
I use creo schematics 2.0.
Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated.
I used to work with ProE W4 M200. I now use Creo Parametric 2 and it takes some getting used to.
Apparantly there is a Geometry Pattern and a "Normal" Pattern. The normal pattern works the same as it did with Wildfire 4, but the Geometry Pattern has some options disabled and creates "copies"(?) of the patterned feature?
What are the pros and cons of these patterns?
When should you use one over the other?
Thank you for reading, and even more thanks for answering.
Hello All,
Is it there any command or any way to (like macro) to repeat last command?
Please help.
Manish